Is It Me, Or Is It Drafty In Here?

This is too good to pass up or even delay, since it fits right in with the spirit (no pun) of the Season. Just in time for Halloween, the folks at the Committee for Sceptical Inquiry, in their mag The Sceptical Inquirer, have published a report on ghosts, zombies, vampires and other creepies, as seen from the viewpoint of two physicists. The Blogging Grouch was much taken by their mathematical demonstration that vampires cannot exist, because, if they did, and continued to sip as legend says they do, the number of non-vampire humans would drop to zero. It’s a longish read, so be prepared to spend some time with it.
Booo!

Crete and the British, or Three of Them Anyway.

You know how it is…one thing leads to another. I was reading a review of a new life of John Pendlebury, a British archaelogist of the early decades of the last century. He was a scholar, a prodigy even, an athlete and outdoorsman, and when WWII rolled around, a soldier.JP spent a lot of his professional scholarly life “digging” in Crete and in Egypt, trying to unravel the relationship between those ancient cultures. He met his end on Crete when he was shot by the German forces, presumably because he out of uniform,and working as a spy and agent, a condition which would have removed him from the protections of the Geneva Convention. Reading the reivew put me in mind of another Englishman running around on Crete: Patrick Leigh Fermor. His A Time of Gifts recounts his attempt, as a very young man, to walk from the Dutch coast to Istanbul. It’s a gem of travel writing, a genre the British seem to have taken over almost completely. Fermor also got involved with the “spook” section of the Forces, parachuted or boated into and out of Crete several times. He was, get this, in charge of a coup de main which kidnapped a German general, Karl Kreipe, the garrison comander and spirited him off the island, while the troops went bananas trying to find him. All rather Bondish, and movieish, but absolutely the way it happened. While crossing some rough country at daybreak, Kreipe quoted a line from Horace, while looking at a distant mountain. Fermor finished the quote for him and then recited the rest of the ode. Their rather tense relationship improved somewhat after that, one Classicist to another and all. Fermor went on to write several other interesting books. I’ve wondered whether there wasn’t more “spook” in his work than he let on. He certainly got to some rather odd places. And finally, there was Michael Ventris, a former RAF navigator and architect who decided that he would decipher Cretan Linear B… a script that had been discovered there and had resisted every attack. He came to this rather remarkable resolve after having heard a lecture by the dean of Cretan, or Minoan, studies, Sir Arthur Evans. Ventris himself learned langauges very easily, but had little training in classical methods. But he was clever enough to identify all the researchers working on Linear B and get them to cooperate, with himself serving as the clearing house for information. It was a kind of pre-Internet blog or wiki, without computers. In 1952, he announced via BBC radio that he thought he had done it…deciphered what was probably the oldest known example of a writing system in Europe. After some initial scepticism about the work of an “outsider”, archaeologists and linguists were won round and his accomplishment recognized, especially after another young scholar, John Chadwick, began to collaborate on the decipherments. Unfortunately, Ventris died in an auto accident at the age of 34. Well, there it is: three very unusual men, all marvelously gifted, all accomplishing a great deal while they were very young. Crete, and things Cretan, were one element they had in common. That,and the fact they were among the last to feel the tug of the Ancient World and its literature, opened to them by the education they had been given, a kind of education that seems almost incredibly impractical to us now, but for them served as a stimulus and guide to adventure and achievement.

The Man Who Deciphered Linear B: The Story of Michael Ventris by Andrew Robinson. Thames & Hudson (June 2002)

A Time of Gifts: On Foot to Constantinople: From the Hook of Holland to the Middle Danube (Paperback),by Patrick Leigh Fermor.Penguin 1988. 012 100-494-73
0500-9109-76

THE RASH ADVENTURER;A life of John Pendlebury by Imogen Grundon. Libri. 2007 978 1 901965 06 3
Review

More

New at the Medical Library.

LibraryLink is also an announcement medium for developments at the Moody Medical Library. Our local readers should know that the MML has added three new and quite interesting services. An@tomyTV is a suite of 3D interactive models of human anatomy including MRIs, X-rays, live-action movies and animations. The Bates Visual Guide to Physical Examination is available in streaming video format. DyanMed is an evidence-based point of care system. Over 2000 clinical summaries can be read on or off-campus and a PDA version is available. (These items are subscription services and access is restricted to UTMB personnel.)

Nature Rolls Out the Book Truck.

The editors of Nature try to keep up with current books in the sciences, and often provide excellent reviews when something special comes along. Each issue has several reviews and from time to time, there is a sort of book review festival. And that’s what readers can look for in the current issue. First, a tip: be sure you check out the New in Paperback section. Moving on, as they say. Two books on the neuropsychology of music are reviewed, including one by the always interesting Oliver Sacks. Three books on math, mathematicians and what they do are also covered. There is a new work on using math in fighting cancer. But, the pick of the litter is: Suffer and Survive: the extreme life of J S Haldane. Extreme ain’t the half of it. Haldane, a respiratory physiologist and physician, was driven by his curiosity to the point that he conducted some very perilous, even irresponsibly dangerous experiments- on himself. He locked himself in a chamber and then let in various toxic gases, to see what would happen. Right. Amazingly, the guy lived into his seventies, and in an active life did research on coal miners, submarine sailors, WWI soldiers who had been gassed…anything to do with lungs, breathing and the like. His brother was an eminent legal scholar, statesman (he forced the British Army to get modern, fast) and an admirier of the philosophy of Hegel, some of whose works he translated into English. I think we’ll stop there for today, children. The contrast between people in public life then and now, is enought to bring one to tears. Of course, Clinton played the saxaphone. Take that, Haldane!

The Future of the Scientific Article.

We talked about the future of the book, so it’s only fair that we devote a little space and ink to the future of the article. Clifford Lynch, of the Coalition for Networked Information, has a contribution in CT Watch Quarterly for August, 2oo7. Clifford Lynch has a reputation for intelligent analysis of what’s going on in information science research and development. He writes clearly, without blizzards of jargon, so, it usually pays to read him and to think about what he says. In this piece, Lynch discusses some major trends in the composition and review of articles appearing in scientific journals . Some of these are technical in character, while others are “professional”, or perhaps “sociological”, in that some journal editors, stung by the rash of recent fakery scandals, are taking a tougher line with authors on the matter of supplying supporting data. The more unusual the reported finding the greater the demand will be for authors to back it up to the editors’ satisfaction. So, if you want to say that you produced moonbeams from cucumbers, in Swift’s example, you better be able to prove it. There is also an interesting section on the importance of photography. Research data and what to do about it, or them for the Latin purists, are becoming hot issues. There is pressure to store data and re-use or re-purpose the findings later on. But this means outlay by universities and other research institutes, and they’re not too happy about it. In the print era, preservation was the Library’s problem. Scholars wrote, publishers published and Libraries preserved. One, two , three and never the thrain shall meet. But now, publishers and other institutions are being forced by the logic of their situation to assume de facto preservation repsonsibilities which can run into real money very quickly. Stay tuned. Article
PS. While you’re there, take a look at the pieces by Paul Ginsparg and Herbert van de Sompel in the same issue.

Herman Melville a Blogger?

Huh? Yeah, that’s what I said. But Deven Desai looks at the proposition in an interesting way. Melville’s Moby Dick is on all the lists of the Great Classics, but,actually reading it defeats many, your correspondent among them. Desai says we’re thinking about this the wrong way. Don’t look at reading MD as a task like cleaning the garage, or as a great pilrimage to the shrine of Art. Think about it as a blog. After all, most of the chapters are first-person, most of them rather short. Some advance the story, and others seem to be just Ishmael BS-ing with the other sailors, kvetching about stuff, writing down odd facts and sudden insights. Sometimes he’s in a good mood. Sometimes he’s grumpy. Add all that up and you get B-L-O-G. Desai says that this way of approaching the book has “freed” him to enjoy it. Think of the chapters as posts, read a couple, come back a day or so later, read a couple more. Hmmmm. It might work.
Fish Story
By the way, this post appears on a blog by and for lawyers and law school profs, called Concurring Opinions, which itself is worth a glance now and then. A BIG plus on this site are the reviews of deepish books on law and legal matters.

Books and Films About Never-Neverland(s).

Why are magic, SciFi, speculative fiction, such big biz in showbiz nowadays? That’s a good question. An article in The New Humanist tries to come up with something like an answer.The author is relatively cool about it all, in contrast to some observers who consider this prevalence of stories involving the preter-and-supenatural as a blight and a menace to rationality and the growth of scientific understanding among the citizenry. Maybe. But, we humans love stories. We gotta have our stories. And, the best tellers have often junked the Here and Now in favor of some Other Place and Time as an arena in which to let their tales unfold. In fact, Joe and Jane Average probably get all the the Here and Now they can handle in the course of a day as it is, so a trip into Narnia for a couple of hours could be just a nice way to put your feet up for a while, so to speak, and not have to deal with the mess. The author suggests two reasons for this development: one is that the “regular” fare of doctor, lawyer and cop shows has become increasingly formalized and predictable, even though some of them are well done from a technical or professional point of view. The other reason is the accession to power of geeks and nerds who intuit that space and fantasy realms are the place to set great stories with immense consequences, depending on who wins. The Grouch is sympathetic. SciFi/Fantasy is a place, to which we can slip off and watch struggle, and think about it, “safely” so to speak. We have our own tensions and struggles here in Real Life, but we can’t talk about them or think about them because we just can’t handle it. War for instance. It’s all around. Take your pick. But the Broadway revival of Robert Cedric Sherrif’s WWI play Journey’s End was a box office floppola, even though it garnered awards and acolades by the carload. It was a quality production, with fine acting, of a good play, but it lost money. Maybe it was too real. But, I’ll bet a dollar that the same story gussied up in improbable costumes and set on the planet Blythixt, with good effects and moody music, would do just fine. It’s a puzzlement, as the King said. There are currents swirling in deep waters, and pop culture is one place where these can be tracked, a little anyway.
The New Humanist

Our Readers Should Look at the Scholar’s Space.

If you read LibraryLink with any frequency, you should also be reading The Scholar’s Space a blog published as part of the work of the Texas Digital Library. Before I get too fulsome about the high caliber of the material posted there, let me say that I am one of the contributors. But don’t let that put you off since there are other contributors and editors who know their way around the library racket very well, who have oddles of experience in the realms of academic publication, intellectual property rights, informatiton technology and related matters. And, to be frank, they often capture the pure excitement of what’s happening now in scholarly communication much more vividly than any screed of mine does. What was that line from Wordsworth about the fierce emtions released by the French Revolution…”bliss it was in that dawn to be alive”? Something like that. Anyway, put the Space on your blog prowling list.
Scholar’s Space

A Biologist’s Guide to Getting a Job.

The Chicago Guide to Landing a Job in Academic Biology
by C. Ray Chandler, Lorne M. Wolfe & Daniel E. L. Promislow

University of Chicago Press: 2007. 176 pp. $14.
The title says it all. There is a review in Nature, which is sort of facing both ways. Approving, in a sort of rueful way, of the practical ideas and hints contained in the book, the reviewer also meditates on whether such tactics really contribute to the recruitment of the best talented researchers and teachers for Biology departments, or whether they simply help push forward those willing and able to game the recruitment process. Selection of academics may be coming to resemble the selection of business types. Shudder!
Jobs

National Library of Medicine Delivers CITING MEDICINE.

The Grouch was away for a while, on the Left Coast, house sitting and caring for granddaughters while their parents were on missions of import. So, it took a while to dig through the accumulation of messages, posts, “get back to mes” and the other digital detritus we gather so easily in the internet era. One of the pleasant surprises in the dig, however, was a notice from NLM that the long awaited electronic style guide Citing Medicine is now available for consultation by authors who may be puzzled about the correct way to use web references or other electronic documents in their scholarly communications. CM has been in the works for a while now, and this online version follows on some earlier printed manuals and reference tools. The blurb describing the new style guide can be read at:
CM
The blurb has an embedded link to the actual document. CM can also be found on the PubMed Bookshelf. The conventions of scholarly communication we use now developed over a long period, and with not a little contention about the best way to do something. There were, inevitably, national differences in matters of citation as well. In the digital age many of the same problems persist: what to call something, for instance…that’s title to you, chum. Or who is responsible for the creation of the document…something like authorship, maybe? CM is not the last word, but it is a good start. The style guide is available to anyone at any time without charge.
We also noted in a previous post the arrival of an online version of the venerable Chicago Manual of Style, which is a subscription service.
CMoS