Terrible, terrible I admit, but how often do you get a chance with something like this. It’s like walking into a room and finding the pen of your aunt on the table. I defy you NOT to say: “la plume de ma tante…” JoVE is the Journal of Visualized Experiments. And, the National Library of Medicine has decided to index these visual productions for inclusion in PubMed/MEDLINE and then to be archived in PubMed Central. MEDLINE used to be restricted to journal literature, pretty strictly, despite a few experiments along the way. But it’s clear to everybody that dissemination of scientific information is not, and can’t be, confined to printed sources, and that the discovery systems which were in place to monitor publication in the various subject areas will have to change some of their rules for inclusion. Items from the Cochrane Library and from the Current Protocols series are already indexed for MEDLINE, but this is the first time a non-printed resources has been introduced into the database. JoVE looks like an interesting critter. Here’s the link to the JoVE official blog and you can review progress so far.
JoVE
Monthly Archives: August 2008
A New Tool For Web Publishing.
Technology Review offers an introduction to a new resource that will help people publish on the Web without having to hack their own HTML, and without having to sacrifice features they really would like because the editing program they use doesn’t support them. The package is called Drupal, and it was thought up by a clever fellow named Dries Buytaert, who is, I think, from Flanders, which makes him a Fleming. Drupal comes from the Dutch word for “droplet”, and it’s an open source publishing suite with very good flexibility and a concern for user support. Dr.Buytaert received his PhD degree in computer science from the University of Ghent. He is now very busy nurturing his brain-child and in running one or two other companies, which he also founded during coffee breaks or something. The article outlines why Drupal is a favorite among people with Web publishing plans, and I can testify from reading or scanning discussion lists dealing with libraries, that the package has been enthusiastically taken up by librarians in managing their own insititutions’ various publishing efforts.
Drupal
Rounding Up the Unusual Suspects.
This blog has an eye out for the odd, poorly-fitting and weird,a little bit like Manley Hopkins’ poem Pied Beauty “all things counter, original, spare, strange”. So let’s see what the poorly-fitting have been up to recently. Well, Gavin Menzies has published another book, called 1434, which promises to be a worthy successor to his first hit, 1421. You’re a little puzzled? Let me elucidate. Gavin Menzies is a retired Royal Navy career officer, and a former commander of submarines. On a trip to China, he became acquainted with the voyages of the admiral Zheng He, in the Ming dynasty. The admiral commanded a fleet of what were described as enormous junk-type wooden ships, and made a number of exploratory and commercial cruises through the Malay Archipelago, to India and across the Indian Ocean to the east coast of Africa. This part is pretty much standard and generally accepted, apart from some hesitations on technical matters. Menzies asserts his studies convinced him that Admiral Zheng and his merry band continued their voyage and wound up in the New World, scooping Columbus and the others by a good half-century. You say you want more? Ok, Zheng He kept on going to their home ports in China, thereby circumnavigating the world many decades before Magellan’s voyage in 1519. Whew, indeed. Menzies got a lot of flack and a passel of bad reviews,which criticized the book for being long on assertion and short on proof. Now, our sailor is at it again, with a new book, 1434. In this one, he claims that Zheng He visited Italy, and that this visit from a more advanced civilization was what ignited the Renaissance. DaVinci’s drawings rely on material copied from Chinese sources. The western explorers such as Columbus, Magellan and Cook had charts derived from Chinese documents, and on like that. Menzies says that there is evidence, all over the place, but it just hasn’t been looked at in the proper way,namely as remnants of a visit by this immense fleet of Chinese ships. His critics say, no way. They claim Menzies has taken a very small ball of what might be evidence and run all over the place with it. Of course, nobody can claim such voyages were impossible for the Chinese, since European sailors did pretty much the same thing. It’s a great yarn, and if it helps people get interested in history, all to the good. On the other hand, some of it looks distressingly familiar: the Lone Investigator courageously taking on Establishment lackeys and dupes, the “strange but true” tale They Don’t Want You to Know. Maybe it’s just a little too much like Roswell. But, if we’re looking for the Unusual, Gavin Menzies and his work fit the bill just fine.
1434: The Year a Magnificent Chinese Fleet Sailed to Italy and Ignited the Renaissance’ by Gavin Menzies (HarperCollins) .
Here’s a link to the London Telegraph story on GM:
Menzies
Moving on, we come to the realm of Giant Vegetables and the people who grow them. Yes, I admit, it is a leap. You may not have thought much about Giant Vegetables. I admit I hadn’t thought much about them. But there are people who think a lot about them and who engage, quite seriously, in annual competitions to grow the heaviest, largest, widest, longest or whatever superlative you care to assign to their various legumes, tubers and what not. There is a book about British enthusiasts, but I’m sure that you can find their trans-Atlantic cousins without too much difficulty. A couple of things stand out here: this seems to be a guy thing, and, nobody seems to be much concerned with how the products taste,or whether they can be used for anything. It seems that they taste awful and, once the competition is over, the only thing to do with them is turn them into animal feed or fertilizer. It sort of contradicts that Woody Allen movie, Sleeper, set 200 years in the future, in which Our Hero steals giant vegetables from some farming site and eats them with apparent relish. Of course, they’ve got 200 years to improve the product, but still, you have to wonder.
The Biggest Beetroot in the World: Giant Vegetables and the People Who Grow Them by Michael Leapman. Aurum, £14.99; 267pp. There is a nice, tongue-in-cheekish review in The London Times at:
Big Veg
The last entry in our little random walk among the odd has to do with the early days of forensic science, in fact, with the man who probably did more to introduce medical scientific evidence into criminal trials than anybody else: Sir Bernard Spilsbury. I remember when my father, a police officer, brought home from the library a book called The Scalpel of Scotland Yard: a life of Sir Bernard Spilsbury. I don’t recall much about it, apart from the title. Spilsbury was very effective as a witness for the Crown, since he was well-prepared, and seemed to be in control of all the arcane and highly technical details about blood, decomposition, estimating height, weight, gender, and all the other things that we have come to accept without a shudder from watching CSI, BONES, CROSSING JORDAN . In fact Sir Bernard may have been a little too good, excessively positive when the evidence was more than a little iffy. He was often guided by his sense of what had to be the case rather than by the actual evidence in hand, or been influenced by his very active prejudices. Now, the Scalpel’s papers have been purchased by the Wellcome Foundation and will no doubt be examined closely, to see if they shed any light on some of the more famous cases. Read more:
Scalpel
Privacy? Fuggedaboudid!
Concurring Opinions is a blog for law profs. I look at it now and then, just to see what’s up there, because the various guests and commentators sometimes write about things that are fairly close to the spirit of this blog here, or this here blog as we say in Texas. The profs have been urged to read through an issue of Scientific American that is devoted to the fate of privacy in an increasingly online society. There are about ten items in the issue, and they all sound worth reading. One that looks especially appealing discusses the use of RFID tags to track people surreptitiously.The Library world has been keenly interested in the use of RFID in collections management programs. WALMART used its muscle to force suppliers into using RFID techniques in shipping and warehousing, and a lot of them didn’t like being frog-marched that way, but they had to go along or be dropped. Some merchandise already has RFID tags applied, for example on garments, in the tags you throw away. Libraries need to see the price of the stickers drop some more before the method gets an entree into their administrative practices. Another of the SA articles deals with ensuring privacy of genetic information, and other medical information too, while we’re at it. It’s not that privacy advocates have been off someplace playing cards and are only now showing up at the party. They have been worrying and warning about privacy concerns a good deal. Some of their objections seemed unlikely and premature, since the technology wasn’t up to doing what they were afraid it could do. But the gap is closing. One way out is for the government to ensure by legislation and enforcement that citizen privacy has very stong legal protection, supported in practice, and good luck with that one. The very biggest privacy buster is, and will be, Uncle YouKnowWho. You might as well ask a six year old kid to shoot Santa Claus. Citizens could also stop being such dopes about privacy and start taking it more seriously and demand that others do so also. Yeah, maybe that will work. At least the SA article will tell you how you are being bugged, observed, surveilled and monitored.
Privacy
Now You See It, or Maybe Not.
I like magic, stage magic. I’m a sucker for any act featuring card tricks, coin tricks, the “close -up” stuff, not all the Vegas style disappearing elephant things, although I’ll watch that too. My family looks at me with expressions of vague unease or concern. But, I press on. Those of us cursed in this way enjoy the show biz side, and only occasionally wonder “how can they do stuff like that”? Well, researchers in cognitive science think they know, and the answer is a little surprising:it’s not so much what magicians “do”. It’s more how what they do takes advantage of the way our minds are structured to make sense of the world. Magicians provide circumstances in which our minds will do the magic for them. A story in today’s Science Today section of the New York Times discusses the results of some research carried out by neuroscientists working with stage magicians, in which the investigators claim that successful performers are adept at exploiting the cognitive structures of our brains in ways that bring about the effect the artist is looking for. There are little gaps, or crevices or seams in the apparently smooth but actually somewhat creaky link-up of perception, identification, analysis, decision and reaction going on in our noodle. Those blind spots are where the magician plants the cues, tricks and misdirections that persuade us we are seeing what we are supposed to see. The mind stays a little too long, or just a tad not long enough, on some feature of the act, and we are fooled.
This is the story in the Times:
Magic
If you can’t get it there, try the Blog 3 Quarks Daily at
Quarks
Google Books Invades Europe.
The city Library of Lyons has agreed to join the Google Books digitization project. This is a surprise, since there was much fluttering (in French) in the dove cotes when the Books project was announced. The complaint was that “Anglo-Saxon” materials would dominate scholarly interest, since they would be the ones most likely to turn up in something run by Anglo-Saxons, like Google Books. The head of the National Library of France wrote a book warning against this danger. But it seems somebody forgot to tell the people in Lyons to bar their doors. Google will digitize more than half of the 1.3 million texts in the Library at no charge, in return for license rights. Instead of just kvetching, the NLF is going to do some digitizing of its own, and an All-Europe program is underway too.
Lyons
Solzhenitsyn Dead at 89.
Aleksandr Isayevitch Solzhenitsyn, Nobelist in literature, the author of The Gulag Archipelago , Cancer Ward , The First Circle , One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovitch and numerous other novels died Sunday, as the result of a stroke. He was internationally famous as a courageous dissident author, who chronicled the suffering of innocent persons swept up in the arbitrary horror and craziness of Stalin’s purges. AS was himself a victim of the paranoid nature of the Soviet regime, having been sent to the labor camps because of incautious remarks he had made as an artillery officer on the Russo-German front in World War II. He spent several years “where songs never cease, and the dancing never stops”, and more years in “internal exile”. Although he moved to the USA, Solzhenitsyn was no poster child for the happy emigrees. He criticized the materialism and stupidity of much of American life,to the annoyance of some who felt he should have been more grateful. AS refused to be a Cold War pawn, lived and worked quietly in Vermont, and when the Soviet Union went into receivership, returned to his native country. Age, infirmity and illness prevented him from playing a major role in public life. He was very displeased with the greed and cupidity he saw in the new Russia, and let everybody know about it, too, not sparing feelings. There, as here, he was sometimes dismissed as a bad-tempered scold.
Solzhenitsyn the writer, joins that little band of geniuses whose work is one of the chief glories of Russian culture: Tolstoy, Turgenev, Chekhov, Dostoyevsky. Much of his work concerns the purges and the lives and fate of the zeks (inmates). I read One Day straight through and started it again. It was made into a decent movie with Tom Courtney in the title role. You came out of the theater feeling cold.
Solzhenitsyn was probably not an easy man to be around. I guess he was angry a lot and impatient with complacent fools, and, after what he had suffered, scornful of the petty concerns which play such a part in our lives. He thought that much of American life was shallow and trivial, devoted to excess and waste. How can a man who has survived the Camps react to NASCAR, All You Can Eat restaurants, “celebrities”, the disdain for real learning in our schools, with anything other than amazement and outrage? And when he found pretty much the same thing in Russia, it made him angrier still.
Gulag, by the way, is an acronym, like NASA, for the Soviet bureaucracy in charge of running the Camps. If you sprinkled the locations of the camps over a blank map of the USSR, you would see something like a group of islands on a white sea, an archipelago.
Arts and Letters Daily has many obits and evaluations:
Daily