“Frankenstein”. Well, what were you expecting, on Halloween yet? One of the two ‘archetypes’ of horror characters…the other being Dracula, of course…Frankenstein has been through so many blenders, slicers, processors, versions, pastiches, sequels and prequels that it’s very difficult to keep up with them all. Of course, they all go back to the novel by Mary Shelley, vacationing with a group of friends in Italy, during an unaccustomed rainy summer. Well, maybe, not exactly like that, quite. The manuscript history of Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus is rather tangled. The earliest drafts seem to have been lost. And Mary’s husband Percy seems to have contributed a good bit to what emerged as the final version, in the form of suggestions, emendations, elaborations and so on. How do I know all this? Well, there is a book about the whole deal. And not just any old book, but what sounds like the absolute last word:
Charles E. Robinson, editor
FRANKENSTEIN OR THE MODERN PROMETHEUS
The original two-volume novel of 1816–1817 from the Bodleian Library Manuscripts by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley (with Percy Bysshe Shelley)
448pp. Bodleian Library. £14.99.
978 1 85124 396 9
The review in The Times gives a good account of what the editor has accomplished, and I found the amount of Shelley’s contribution rather surprising at first, but then, on reflection, not so much. What else would you expect from a writer? And I guess Mary asked for his suggestions, and he was glad to comply. Maybe getting him to shut up and leave you alone to write the thing was the tougher job. Besides, it was raining a lot and there wasn’t much to do.
Reading the review got me to thinking about all the Frankenstein versions and take offs and rip offs I’ve watched in 70 years….plenty. De gustibus and all that, but the scariest one was the version starring Kenneth Branaugh as the Doctor and Robert DeNiro as the Monster….that’s right, DeNiro. A lot of people didn’t like it. Go figure. Young Frankenstein the Mel Brooks take off, has a special place in my heart…”Transylvania 65000″ will stil make me chuckle, as will the thought of Chloris Leachman as Frau Bluecher.
Well, a Happy Halloween to you all.
Review
The Chronicle of Higher Education has a story on the Rysback, and pursues the question of Percy Shelley’s role in greater detail, if you’re interested:
Chronicle
Monthly Archives: October 2008
Cardiologists Face Senate Scrutiny.
Cardiologists from Columbia University are being queried by investigators from the office of Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, with reference to potential conflicts of interest arising from their dual roles as investigators on the one hand and their connection to a research foundation with ties to the medical device industry on the other. The Senator is concerned that these ties might bias the doctors in their evaluations of various therapeutic devices and techniques. The NIH is also examining conflicts of interest on the part of its awardees and as part of this process has frozen funding on a grant to a psychiatrist at Emory University, who it is said failed to report considerable sums received for work as a consultant. The article in Science makes a special point of noting that research universities are watching both these actions carefully and with some anxiety.
The Christian Science Monitor Calls it Quits.
Well, not exactly, but pretty close. The Christian Science Monitor will discontinue publication in print and shift to an online only format. There will be a weekend magazine, and the paper will keep all eight of its foreign bureaus open Its publication schedule will also change from daily to weekly. During its century-long publication history, the Monitor gathered a reputation for fair, accurate and objective reporting. Circulation was never large, but the paper’s influence was considerable, since people in DC would talk to reporters with the confidence that what they were saying would be reported accurately and without partisan slant. They also hired people with brains, who knew how to write. It’s hard for me to see anything but a defeat in this move, but I’m a dinosaur. The editor says the paper is just facing facts and is doing now what other sheets will have to do later.
Read more:
CSM
Tony Hillerman Dead at 83.
Tony Hillerman, author of the mysteries featuring the Navajo tribal police detectives Joe Leaphorn and Jim Chee, died in Alburquerque at the age of 83. The author of 18 novels set in the Navajo lands of the American Southwest, Hillerman was born in Oklahoma and began his education at a school for Potawatomie Indians, an experience which gave him a lifelong interest in and respect for Native American society and culture. During WWII, he served in the infantry, as a mortarman. He was wounded during the fighting in Alsace and returned to the USA to continue his university studies. Hillerman was drawn to journalism and worked on or edited a number of newspapers in the Southwest. He gained a master’s degree in journalism and became head of the journalism department at the Unversity of New Mexico. Most of the jobs he had in his adult life involved writing in some way. In the Leaphorn/Chee novels, he managed to fuse character, plot, spectaculer setting and cultural concerns into readable, absorbing novels of crime fiction. It’s as far from Miss Marple or Philip Marlowe as you can get, but it’s the real article. In recent years Hillerman had been in poor health, and was starting to lose both his vision and his hearing. In addition to his crime fiction, Hillerman wrote or edited many other books, including a memoir, a story for children and works on the history and culture of the Southwest.
This is the obit from the LA Times:
Obit
That Lady Again…and Her Lamp.
A new life of Florence Nightingale has been published. It attempts to steer a course between the too-reverential sticky sentimentality of the “Lady with the Lamp”, and the rather down-market treatment dished out by Lytton Strachey in Eminent Victorians, his slashing debunking of four major figures in British public life of the time.
Author Mark Bostridge has his work cut out for him, but a sympathetic review in the Wall St. Journal seems to agree that he has managed an interesting study of a complex woman, who was both more and less than her legend. She could be funny, gentle, sympathetic and a good companion, but also tart in speech, unbending, and a bad enemeny to have, especialy for a politician to have. FN had her own ideas about things, to put it mildly. And she was not above using her enormous reputation to make sure things got done her way. FN’s father recognized her intelligence and insisted that she be given the best education possible, an advantage not given to all bright daughters of the day. Suitors showed up, and were tolerated, but she wanted to do something, something useful and important. Domesticity was not on the menu, and she interested herself in health and in new ideas about the care of the sick. The family was far from pleased with Florence, whose answer to everything, thus far, had been “no, not for me thanks”, but when the Crimean War broke out, the woman and the hour met. Stories about the neglect of the wounded shocked the public, already dismayed at the rather lackluster battlefield performance of the Forces mired on the Crimean peninsula. No Waterloos there. Something within Florence Nightingale clicked, and she was on her way. The work she did in reforming the care of wounded in the British Army has become legendary, and her success gave her a great stock of public good will and approval. To be on the wrong side of an issue on which Miss Nightingale had expressed herself was tricky business indeed. Oh yeah, right, in all doing this, she created the foundations of modern nursing care. Let’s not forget that. It was an immense achievement and as one who has benefited from modern nursing care, I’m willing to excuse some faults of character in the woman who got it all going. I can’t think of any better way to honor the Lady than to get hold of the book and read her life.
Florence Nightingale
The Expresso Book Machine Debuts at UMich.
This blog has reported on POD…Publishing On Demand…initiatives as theoretical possiblities, but now the real animal has been sighted, and in fact is up and running at one of the University of Michigan’s libraries. The Expresso Book Machine (EBM) allows users to select a title from the list of items available and have it printed, bound and delivered right there. The EBM implementation comes from an outfit called Books on Demand, and Michigan’s is the pioneer installation. The company expects to install many such devices all over the place, and not just in academic libraries. Right now, the limitation on the service is copyright. The books available are those that are outside the protection period imposed by current US law, and that means books published up to 1923. But, if POD turns out to be what its advocates think it will be, I doubt if it will be long before authors and publishers begin thinking about ways to get in on another method of selling books. There is a good deal of anxiety in publishing circles about the economics of the book trade, and to keep the industry healthy, publishers and authors may have to look at distribution outlets they would have scorned before, as too down-market and lacking in “tone”, or for other reasons. After all, a POD installation does resemble a vending machine, or better, it IS a vending machine, and is a long way from a hushed Barnes and Noble with its attached cafe and soothing piped in Bach or Mozart. Hats off to UMich, by the way, for being first out of the chute with this. The University libraries have been very energetic in thinking about ways to maximize the effect of digital techniques on the creation, use and preservation of the scholary record, so kudos to our colleagues up North.
Here’s the story:
Expresso
Springer Buys BioMed Central.
The second largest STM (science, technology, medicine) publisher, Springer Science+Business Media, has purchased the Open Access publisher BioMed Central (BMC). BMC is supposed to remain an autonomous and independent business unit within the Springer corporate structure, and nothing is supposed to change in the day to day operations. It’s a canny move. Springer wants to be on both sides of the stream to see whether Open Access publishing really pays off as a serious busniess model, and owning an OA publisher in addition to having a quite large stable of conventional publishing products is a good way to do it. BMC picks up at least some prospect and promise of help from a very large organization. I wonder what will happen a year from now.
Letters From Galveston, no. 2.
The weather has changed, after the passage of a cool front. The sky is now leaden, and there’s a bit of a wind. Add this to the dull brown of the dead leaves and you get a rather grim picture. Here at UTMB, the recovery effort is coming along. Students are back, and the researchers are slowly bringing their labs onstream again. There are a number of safety and environmental concerns that have to be dealt with, and there will be general meeting of bench researchers and their grad students to talk about the process. Our Library is still arctic although the forced draft of cold air has been stopped. The big plastic sausages running up the stairwells and across the reading rooms are deflated and sagging, but it’s chilly enough nonetheless to make a warm sweatshirt or pullover an important item to keep in the office or stuff into your backpack. Food services has opened a tent, with a fixed menu of hot meals at one price, and that is very welcome. The University’s Field House has reopened, without the pool or spa or steam room, but with scheduled work outs and access to the machines, and that’s welcome also, as is any sign of returning “life”. The City is still trying to survey damages and decide which residences can be reconstructed and which have to be demolished or raised to meet flood control standards. The uncertainty about which properties go into which category is very trying, and many people are unhappy at what they see as a tepid and faltering response by the local administrators to the problem of rebuilding. We see a mix of advanced technology (cell phones, web sites) and medieval behavior (rumors), so people are calling one another to discuss things that may not be, and probably aren’t, true. I would guess that many are going ahead with reconstruction efforts without building permits or other documents because they are anxious to put an end to the temporary arrangements they have made and get their lives back. I just looked out the window and saw a line of men in hard hats walking from 9th to 10th Sts, doing heaven only knows what. I can’t tell who they are or what they’re up to but I confess, that seeing “officials” has started to rouse in me a sense of irritated suspicion, since my feeling is they probably won’t do much to help and will likely add to the confusion. I just noticed that it’s hard for people to look good in hard hats, and why should you wear one when walking up the street? What’s going to happen? Are the squirrels annoyed too, and are they going to bombard the guys with acorns or something? Our house has been inspected or surveyed three times, by different goups. No findings were reported to us, and we still don’t know anything definite. They measured and took pictures and then disappeared, like in the Arabian Nights. You can read about various businesses opening, or promising to open, but also about a good number that can’t or won’t. Heavy damage to buildings in which they rent space and loss of inventory are making the comeback pretty tough, especially in a tight credit market, and in a period of economic downturn in which people are watching their discretionary spending. So, it’s a mixed picture indeed.The cruise ships which sailed from Galveston will return to their base here and resume their schedule. That’s a big boost for downtown merchants and restaurants, and a spur for some other investors to take over properties that previous business owners are surrendering.
I see new growth on some of the trees, a little green amid the brown, and that’s good. That may strike some of our readers up North as strange, but Galveson has an (almost) year round growing season. The Chinese tallow tree and the camphor trees in our yard are showing green, as is the big maple my son and I planted one Mothers’ Day. We shall see.
Tracking Plagiarism With Software.
The Grouch is looking through missed issues of Nature and other journals to see what is stirring out there in the wider world. One thing is that there has been some progress on tracking what seem to be cases of full-text plagiarism. Investigators in different countries have been tweaking various programs they devised, to determine accuracy. Some of the suspect texts were published in journals with a largely non-English speaking readership. A number of the papers are simply copies of work done earlier by some other team. Others incorporate large portions of “recycled” material, but are not 100% borrowings. Plagiarism has been a problem for editors and publishers, as well as for acadmicians themselves, but there is no consensus on exactly how big the problem is, much less on what to do about it. But, hopes have been raised by the apparent success of some of these text-matching programs, and effective counter measures may be available soon. Declan Butler has a good report on the state of development.
Plagiarism
Letters from Galveston.
For many years, Janet Flaner wrote a feature for The New Yorker called Letters from Paris, under the pen name Genet, with a little circomflex accent over the second e. And Charles Murray wrote Letters from Rome, under his own name. Finally,during the Second Vatican Council, somebody using the pen name Xavier Rynne wrote Letters from Vatican City with his take on what was going on in the various commissions and consistories. These all were extremely interesting, as the authors wrote with intelligence and skill about places and things they knew in detail. So, The New Yorker published a lot of really good letters. That was the inspiration for this post, but it’s a tough act to follow, as they say in showbiz.
Galveston was very badly damaged by Hurricane IKE. This was not a big storm, if you count only peak wind velocities, but what did the damage was the enormous storm surge, which swept into the city from the bay side, not from the Gulf. A local weather buff did some research and found that IKE had the second or third highest surge of any storm to hit Galveston. If you fly over the town, you won’t see much obvious destruction, but on the ground the picture changes. The first thing you will notice is the dead aspect everything has. Salt water of the surge killed a lot of plant life, so trees, shrubs and bushes have been burned into a dullish almost UPS brown. Driving in on the causeway, you ride past boats of all sorts and sizes, thrown onto the highway and now moved to one side. The road is clear, but there is debris on the shoulders; paper, plastic, shoes, wood, anything. The causeway was completely blocked by masses of this stuff, and the recovery crews have performed prodigies in removing it. The same holds for the main seaside artery, Seawall Boulevard. It was clogged with rocks, lumber and other flotsam tossed up by the storm, but now it’s pretty clear, for most of its length. City streets were piled high with sheet rock, plywood, paneling, glass, tile, all of which came from houses that were flooded. Residents were tearing this stuff out because it was wet, and letting it sit causes further damage, and the detritus accumulated rapidly. It was also rapidly hauled off to be dumped onto some designated rubble heaps. Teams of trucks and small bulldozers scraped it, loaded it and hauled it away. There is a tremendous amount of activity, on the main streets, such as Seawall Bl, and that can convey the impression of life, or at least, liveliness. Much of it comes from contractors working on various projects. If you go in town, a little, that impression fades. Many streets manage to look both soggy and burned brown at the same time. Many restaurants, stores, bars and specialty shops were damaged and remain closed. But, there is a trickle of re-openings, and promises on the part of others to rebuild and open as soon as possible. The Grand Opera House took a lot of water and the fall/winter schedule of shows and concerts is in jeoprady. Galveston’s public library, the Rosenberg Library, lost almost all the materials and services on the ground floor. These are heavy blows to the Island’s cultural life.
All the fishing piers which extended out into the Gulf have been destroyed, and the resident’s eye is tricked into looking for them. The Balinese Room disappeared, and that closes a chapter in local history. Back in the Wide Open Galveston days, show biz types like Phil Harris and Alice Faye, Frank Sinatra, the various big bands and swing bands all played the Balinese. Wreckage from these structures wound up all along the Seawall, blocks or even miles from where the buildings stood, according to some crazy law of wreckage distribution.
Our house was flooded and we lost a lot of domestic contents. Some of it was stuff we should have dumped years ago, after the kids left. My wife lost a lot of her sheet music and our CD collection, but we took two of her instruments with us when we fled, and the cello in its case floated on the water, and came to rest on a couch, like the Ark on Mt. Ararat. It was dry inside and the instrument is OK, apart from some minor repairs being conducted at the Amati Violin Shop in Houston. It reminds me of the end of Moby Dick, when the coffin pops up out of the wrecked Pequod and shoots to the surface. Ishmael clings to it and is rescued. Books, clothes, appliances, furniture…Pfutsch. We had some energetic help in mucking out and in gutting the place, so, by local standards, it looks pretty good. I finally realized why people in disasters seem to wander around doing silly things, like picking up a shoe or a piece of paper. When everything has been disturbed, everything seems to be of equal importance. You start off working on this, and then you notice that, which seems to need attention and so on. A lot of it is just shock, of course. It’s very hard to focus. I’ve noticed a few “disaster porn” tourists, but not many. My wife suffered a nasty cut on the leg, while trying to photograph some damage, and it still looks nasty, despite stitiches and heavy artillery antibiotics.
UTMB took a very big hit. Many street level facilities were flooded and restoring them will take a while. The Medical Library is undamaged but lobby-level facilities such as the campus book store were damaged by water and everything had to be dumped and the area cleaned.
Our campus is full of workers in protective clothing, scraping and spraying. Some clinics have moved to temporary quarters on the mainland, and the research effort is getting back to where it was, gradually. Many buildings have power and network connections, but some don’t have water. Or the combination may be reversed: water, but not network, etc. This too is being rectified. Serious illnesses have to be treated elesewhere and operations are not being performed for the time being. People are coming back to work or have been relocated offsite. Classes in the University’s component schools will resume next week. Some Thrid and Fourth year students were relocated, as were some residents and fellows. The recovery effort is amazing, but has a long way to go.
The Red Cross, Salvation Army and any number of “helping” organizations are on hand and doing wonderful things. The fear of large scale disease outbreaks has dissipated. City water services came back much earlier than expected, electicity is common if not ubitquitous, there are no giant mounds of rotting garbage and the expected plague of mosquitoes did not occur, due mainly to the persisting dry, even gorgeous, weather. So, there was some good news.
So, we’re back. It’s been bad, but things are happening. I don’t want to make this blog into a weeper, but some of our readers have asked, and I want to answer. It’s been tough, I can tell you. But maybe the worst is over.