Books and Coffee Beans: a Marriage Made in London.

Today, NPR had a filler about the Espresso Book Machine.This is a nifty gadget that lets you buy a copy of any of 500,000 stored items, have it bound and dropped out the little chute, all in a matter of, well, it depends. War and Peace? You’ll need 15 minutes to get that, which isn’t bad, really. A Dr. Seuss? That will take a couple seconds. The Espresso has been around for several months now,mostly in academic locations. UMich had one of the first, for example. We have to see how it goes. Print on Demand (POD) has been a while in coming. I think it’s been too long in coming, myself. And mass downloadable e-books may have arrived in time to capture much of the market that otherwise would gravitated to POD services. It may even be too late for a big POD breakout because Kindle from Amazon, and SONY’s Book Reader and book applicatons for cell phones arrived first. On the other hand, maybe not. There are different markets and depending on costs and quality, each segment may go to the service best doing what the customer wants. It’s a great time to be around and watching all this. I have to watch my BP and cholesterol, because I want to be on the scene to see what happens.

The UK’s Guardian had an item last Friday on the EBM, which was installed at the Blackwells Charing Cross bookstore, after a rather impressive debut at the London Book Fair. Plans call for an increase in inventory to 1 M books, and for active negotiations with authors and publishers to get more contemporary works into the inventory.
Espresso

Nature Changes Rules on Authorship.

The new issue of Nature contains an announcement from the editor concerning some changes that the journal will now require from authors submitting manuscripts for pubication in any of the research journals. Authors will have to be linked more explicitly to their actual contributions, when more than one or two authors are named on a manuscript. Authors will have to agree in advance about precedence, and statements of responsibility for certain functions such as accuracy and integrity of images or preservation of original data must appear as well. The editor acknowledges that many authors were providing much of this information voluntarily in response to strong editorial encouragement, but these practices will be made incumbent on all.

The Flack Gets Thicker for Google.

A settlement deal between Google and the groups suing it in the matter of book digitization has encountered some unfriendly skies. The US Dept. of Justice has been in talks with the G over details in the proposed settlement. At this point, it all seems to be exploratory and preliminary in character and there has been no decision for the DOJ to intervene in the case. Conversations between Google and DOJ center on the possible anticompetitive nature of the provision giving exclusive rights to the digitization of “orphan” works, ie, those protected by copyright, but not clearly assignable to any copyright holder, because of variations in the law over time. It’s far from End Game for the deal, and everybody and his aunt is at pains to point that out, but it’s not good news for the deal makers, who were expecting a smoother resolution.
My take: DOJ doesn’t know bupkiss about publishing or scholarly interchange, but they watch Google very closely. Read about it here:
Flack

Another View on John Maddox.

Phillip Campbell is the general editor of Nature and succeeded in that office the late Sir John Maddox. Campbell has written, in The Edge, an appreciation of Maddox which is somewhat more careful and even astringent than some of the tributes which came before. I think Maddox was “a hard guy to shave”, as my father used to say, in an expression that doesn’t seem to mean much on paper but which, when coupled with the story he was telling, and the right body langauge and affect, perfectly conveyed his meaning.
Shave

An Unlikely Comic Book Hero.

Bertrand Russell. And, it’s not a comic book. There’s no surer way to make enemies in a small but very zealous area of publishing than to call a “graphic novel” a “comic book”. Little LuLu, Mickey Mouse, Superman…they’re comic books. Graphic novels are bigger, and often much darker in tone and substance than the perpetually sunny world of Little Lulu, where the worst thing that happens is a dropped ice cream cone. Well, it seems that Bertrand Russell is the key figure in a graphic novel that was originally published in Greece, and unexpectedly became a bestseller, and is now poised to take wing into a larger sphere. The topic is the search for the logical basis of mathematics, a task that resulted in the Russell/Whitehead Principia Mathematica, one of the landmark publications in the history of logic and philosophy. Russell shares the stage with other luminaries of 20th century philosophy and math….Hilbert, Goedel, Wittgenstein and of course his co-author Whitehead. Professional reaction to the work has been enthusiastic, and commentators have been satisfied that the ideas are put forth accurately, yet clearly. Publishers from several countries are waiting for clearance to get the novel out in their nations, but the Bloomsbury Press in the UK seems to be the first one outside of Greece to launch it. Accurately? Clearly? OK, I’ll bite. I’m willing to part with a Euro or two to see if the authors really did it or if the profs who looked at it are just kidding themselves. Whatever else may be the case, this is surely a most unusual event in publishing, so I wanted to share it with our readers. Here’s the link to the story in The Guardian:
Logic

Big Rocks in Georgia.

Optimist? Pessimist? Up? Down? Well, maybe there’s something for everyone in the story of the Grorgia Guides. No? Well, relax, because the story is a doozy. Wired magazine has an item on its web site, and to be frank, I read it sort of open-mouthed, like the fella who thought he had seen everything, “and I been to Dallas, twice”. Here’s the poop. The Georgia Guides are a set of four very large granite slaps, arranged in X fashion, around a central pillar, with a capstone. The whole structure in Elberton, GA, is sited to reveal various astronomical events, such as daily noon, the equinoxes, the Polar Star. On the upright faces of the slabs are texts in eight world languages, embodying principles which could be useful in, OK, hang on, reconstituting civilization after some very, very bad thing happens. The structure was commissioned and paid for by a mysterious man, using a pseudonym, who claimed to be the representative of a secret society which had grown increasingly pessimistic about humanity’s chances of avoiding some calamity and the group wanted to ensure that at least something was left over to guide the survivors in getting things going again. Georgia was selected for the quality of its granite ( take that, Vermont!) and presumably for other reasons, such as cheap land. When the mystery dude showed up in this small Georgia town one day in 1979, it was the biggest thing to happen there since Sherman’s March. At first, people thought he was some kind of weirdo, but he began forking over the long green and the locals had to shut up and listen. Whoever said money talks had that down to the nails in his shoes. Keerect, as my dad used to say. The specifications were very exact, and help from the astronomy department at UGA was needed to make sure the observatory part worked right. Sentiment about the texts was divided. Some thought that the message was New-Agey and even sinister, and that the Guides would attract all kinds of religious and semi-religious nuts. And for a while, that sort of happened. A lot of tourism sort of happened too, as people from all over began to make their way to Elberton for a gander at the American Stonehenge. It slackened after the public went after other fads, but had a brief revival in the 1990s, thanks to Yoko Ono. There aren’t many locals left who went through the design and construction of the Guides, but it’s all pretty well documented, and it’s hard to conceal 20 ft slabs of granite. So, the occasional visitor makes the trip. At first, I thought the super-stones would have useful information, like, oh, formulas for areas of figures, the value of PI, the DNA molecule, you know. But, the texts are really kind of moralizing and exhortative, on the lines of “do good and avoid evil”. It’s kind of a let-down really, like the end of Mony Python and the Meaning of Life, where Michael Palin reads the Secret and it’s “Try and be nice to people, avoid eating fat, read a good book every now and then, get some walking in”. Some secret. I worked things out that far on my own, Mr. Homes. But, the tale of the Guides makes for a good story and I was especially taken by the continued friendship, of a rather peculiar kind, between the Mystery Dude and the banker who set up the deal, and who swore absolute silence about the MD’s true identity. It was also interesting to note how MD sent the money..from banks all over the USA, in the US mail. All communication took place by letter. I don’t think a guy could pull that off in this age of the Internet, but, maybe. We can all hope that the Guides never are needed for their intended purpose. And, maybe, if we’re driving around rural Georgia and need peach cobbler infusions or something, or have to stock up on granite, we’ll head for Elberton, and take a look.

Guides

Dr. Nuland Returns.

Sherwin Nuland is a surgeon, a medical educator and an elegant writer. His factual and gripping account, How We Die grabbed popular attention a few years back. He followed this success with other books, such as The Doctors’ Plague,The Mysteries Within and Doctors: the biography of medicine. The Soul of Medicine has just been released. This books asks a dozen specialist for reflections on their most memorable cases, and it turns out that the ones they remember most vividly, or even can’t forget, are those in which they made some simple error, overlooked an obvious point, ignored a warning and then had to scramble. Dr. Nuland visited our campus not long ago and gave a talk on changing medical paradigms, during which he offered an interesting interpretation of hand positions in Rembrandt’s painting The Anatomy of Dr. Tulp.
The Soul of Medicine, by Sherwin Nuland. Kaplan Publishing. 232 pages. 978-1607140559

The WSJ Thinks About E-books.

Yesterday I blogged about electronic textbooks, and today I thought I would follow that up with a story from the Wall Street Journal, to which I was directed by a colleague, and which tackles the topic more generally. The writer thinks the e-book is on the verge of a very great expansion and that this growth will have some interesting social consequences, especially when paired with the near ubiquity of social networking tools and services. He predicts much easier, and therefore far more frequent, sharing and discussion of books, since it will very simple to do this, and almost in real time. A sour assessment would be one saying people should read books, and not waste time talking about their “experience” while reading. There is already far too much shallow “me-talk” around to be healthy, and we don’t need more. One interesting aspect was the suggestion that we will see a great increase in the purchase and distribution of PARTS of books: chapters or sections or selections from an anthology, and the repackaging of these by individual readers for their own purposes.
I think an analogy would be the reprint file kept by serious researchers in the form of reprints or xeroxed copies of articles from professional journals, mostly. I think it’s a common experience for readers to want some parts of book more than others, so, maybe there will be a way for this to happen. Readers love their books, but more and more of them are coming to love their gadgets too. And today’s reading devices are rather primitive, surely, in comparison to what will appear in just a few years. It’s certain too that this new way, or rather, these new ways, of buying, reading and sharing ideas about what we have read will turn out to have some interesting consequences. I would certainly like to be around to see how it all turns out.
WSJ

The Shape of Textbooks to Come.

Declan Butler is one of the editors of Nature, with a brief to monitor what’s happening in scholarly publication generally, and the effect on it of information technologies in particular. In the April 2 issue, he writes a longish survey of how textbook publication is being affected by the spread of e-book publishing. Several experiments and initiatives are in progress, one at UT in Austin, to determine how students react to and interact with textbooks in e-format. Butler sees three factors in the unfolding situation: new devices, that is, new e-book readers which come closer to duplicating the experience of the printed page; new business models, and new ways of preparing textbooks. It’s not all roses, however. New gadgets such as the Kindle and Kindle2 from Amazon are much, much better at letting users read text. But, their navigation features are rather primitive and slow. Students tend to “flip” a lot, and jump around from section to section, rather than read in one continuous process as is the case with a novel. So, E-book readers for academic texts will have to offer more, and better, “mobility” features. They will have to be larger also, and accomodate color. The screens of current ebook readers are too dinky to handle, say, anatomical charts or engineering and scientific graphics in a useful way. So, bigger and in color. No problem say the manufacturers, comin’ up. Well, maybe. There are changes on the business side as well. One thing the publishers have always hated is the secondary market for textbooks, which is now quite well organized thanks to the Net/web. There is a lot of money sloshing around due to the sale by first owners and resale by jobbers to the next class of students. Publishers don’t see a dime of that, and an e-textbook market would let them control who gets what much more effectively with all the money going to them. Butler reports on schemes that would let the student’s access expire at the end of the course, in a lease-like arrangement. And finally, there are changes in the way textbooks are being written. Some methods rely on the use of pre-existing modules which are selected and then joined, maybe with modifications, into the new text. If you’re an author, why write another explanation of basic stuff, like the Periodic Table, or the Krebs Cycle. Find one, use it, and get on with the job. The Connexions Project at Rice University is working on this system, with success. One forecast is for a “coming together” of the gadgets, a kind of Gathering of the Clans, in which cell phones, laptops, readers, calculators and other gizmos are united in one device. That sounds interesting, but I think there are inherent contradictions here. A reader has to be big, and that’s good. But a cell phone should be small and that’s good too. I don’t know how you get big/small in the same unit. I shouldn’t under-estimate human ingenuity, especially when large sums of money are involved, but blending all these things won’t be easy. All very early days yet, and it may be some time before the winning systems appear.

Textbooks

PS: One aspect of the article that I didn’t bring out adequately was the suggestion that the laptop will endure, despite the advantages of ‘near-paper’ displays, simply because so many students already have them, and need them for many other academic purposes. Students, like soldiers, have to hump a lot of gear as it is now, and probably wouldn’t want to pick up yet another thing to schlepp around all day long. So, any book reading scheme that allows the use of the laptop might find favor. It’s also time for Great Simplification in the area of chargers, extension cords, batteries and the associated impedimenta of current info tech. Another synergy, anyone?

Harold Varmus Writes Tell-All Book.

No, that’s just a grabber, to get you to read more. But he did write a new book, and I guess you could call it a “tell-a-lot” book. He won’t be on Oprah with it and I certainly don’t expect any jumping up and down on couches. But, if you want to get some idea of what it’s like to run the NIH, pick your way through the Washington mine field, deal with both dimwits and geniuses, advise those in power trying to make good decisions, temper absurd expectations and exercise all the virtues of prudence, justice, fortitude and temperance, you might want to take a look at:
THE ART AND POLITICS OF SCIENCE. Harold Varmus. xiv + 315 pp. W. W. Norton, 2009. $24.95.

There is a review at the American Scientist web site, but there will surely be more, so I’ll wait and bundle a couple of them for our readers’ convenience.