FULL DISCLOSURE, up front. I am a fan of radio, public radio, NPR and the show THIS AMERICAN LIFE. OK, now let’s get to it. Mike Daisey is an actor, who has a successful show running in New York: “The Agony and the Ecstasy of Steve Jobs”. The show is a monologue. He’s on the stage all alone at a desk, and he tells stories. It worked for Spalding Grey and it’s working for Daisy. Or was, until he did a segment on THIS AMERICAN LIFE. Daisey’s show is designed to make us feel uncomfortable about moral compromises; specifically the ones involved in our purchase and use of products made abroad by workers who are stuck in Stalag-like situations and are worked, if not to death, then very close to it, by outfits such as Foxcomm,which makes Apple products. On Sunday TAL ran a reprise and retraction of its earlier story featuring Daisey and his allegations about worker abuse. Daisey, gamely enough, appeared himself and in a series of awkward questions and long silences, admitted that his story had departed from the facts in several serious ways. A reporter for MARKETPLACE, another public radio show, caught the broadcast and did some checking with his own sources. He then contacted Ira Glass, the producer of TAL and told him that there were serious problems with Daisey’s account. There are two articles, not one but two, about this in today’ s New York TImes Other big papers ran stories on it, and there are numerous web posts. It was also picked up by the sharp dudes at Retraction Watch, who posted about it today. Their take is: scientific journals need to take a page form the TAL notebook. The show on Sunday was a one hour long retraction, in detail, with all the warts, showing how and why the program got it wrong and how it got into trouble by neglecting its own rules. Talk about letting it all hang out. 60 minutes of mea culpa . This contrasts unfavorably with the partial, evasive, minimally truthful retraction statements the RW guys encounter all too often when they try to get behind anodyne statements such as: “The article ..yada, yada, by…xyz was retracted at the request of somebody”. One of the great things about RM is that the boys are willing to dig, since there almost always is a story behind the story.
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/03/16/watch-and-learn-science-journals-this-american-life-retracts-mike-daisey-segment-on-apple-in-china/
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/19/business/media/theater-disguised-up-as-real-journalism.html?_r=1&ref=global
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/19/business/media/theater-disguised-up-as-real-journalism.html?_r=1&ref=global