Publishing, And How It Got That Way.

In The Nation, there is a very good if somewhat long article on the state of publishing today and on the forces and currents and personal decisions which brought us to where we are. It’s not a matter of good guys and bad guys. It’s simply that things happen and then other things happen and before you know it, there you are. So can publishing survive? That’s not the question, which is, can the book business, as currently structured, survive. And the answer to that has got to be: prognosis poor. The industry was always riddled with inefficiencies. The technology of the book was pushed to some quite interesting extremes over the last 500 years or so, and very creative people did some remarkable things. What happened recently however is a real revolution, with which the publishers we now have may not be able to make peace. Amazon is a major figure in the drama, as you might expect. It revolutionized the book buying business, and then it kicked off the first really useful e-book reader, the Kindle. We’re not sure how the story ends, but there are some hints in the article. So, get a cup of something, go to the site and review the piece. You may not like what you find. I certainly didn’t, but I think the writer has the essentials right.

 

http://www.thenation.com/article/168125/amazon-effect

 

 

Venus, And All That.

On June 5, the world will have a chance to observe the transit of Venus, an astronomical event that happens only twice in a century, with an interval of about 8 years between transits. Venus, the planet, crosses the face of the sun, and if you are in the right place and have the right instruments you can make some very nifty observations. Earthbound astronomers, professional and back yard, are delighted. But the transit has historical importance as well. It’s hard for us to accept this but the fact is that most of the great sea voyages before the 1800s were carried out by people who had very little idea of where they were. Latitude, or distance north/south of the equator, could be figured out pretty accurately. But the trick was longitude: location in the other directions. So, Columbus, and Magellan, and the Armada, the Pilgrims and the great fleet battles of the Age of Fighting Sail were all under the same necessity of groping for some clue about longitude. Go west and you’ll bump into something. We think. The fact the Europeans got to America, or to India or Australia and then home again, meant that they were very good sailors, and also that the survivors were very lucky dudes.And a lot of sailors weren’t so lucky.  This whole story has been admirably told by Dava Sobel in her  wonderful, and prize-winning, book Longitude. What everybody  wanted was a reliable and fairly simple way of calculating East-West distance for use on merchant ships and men o’ war to take the guess-work and finger-crossing out of operations.  In the 18th century, that had to be found in the sky. The other method, using a clock set to a fixed time, say London time, and calculating the difference between that and time at observation was theoretically possible, but practically out of reach. Clock technology couldn’t come up with a device that would stand up to the pitching and rolling of a ship, the moisture, the heat, etc. So, look upwards, sailors. The transit provided and opportunity to measure celestial objects very accurately. Maybe there was a method using the facts of astronomy to help captains find their way around. A new book recounts the course of three scientific expeditions whose  purpose it was to observe the transit from different points on the Earth’s surface. An expedition, in 1769, did not involve 14 hours on a jet liner and a few weeks away from home. Each of the three forces faced terrible hardships, and two of the destinations were, and still can be, rather grim places. The English, under Capt. James Cook (“The Great Sailor”) were headed to Tahiti…rough duty, right? But getting there required a trip around Cape Horn, and that was enough to make anybody think twice. The Franco-Spanish group was headed to what is now Baja California. And the Austrian Empire’s outfit was headed to the North Cape of Norway. Oh, goody!  It was just as bad as it sounds. Lots of people didn’t make it back, and all three groups suffered very severely.  It’s all told again in Mark Anderson’s book, The Day the World Discovered the Sun: An Extraordinary Story of Scientific Adventure and the Race to Track the Transit of Venus (Da Capo Press, June 2012)

And take a look at this web site, which has a precis of the book, plus some interesting other fare on the Transit itself.

So on June 5, hold a good thought for those guys.

 

 

More On The Second Greatest Invention.

Not long ago, I praised a famous man: Eugene Polley, whose contribution to civilization was the TV remote control device. Today’s New York Times has a long article on EP and on his invention. He was sly enough to design the Model I version in a pistol-like shape, so that your violent side could get a boost when you aimed the thing at whatever foolishness was offending you at the moment, and zapped it with a press of the trigger. To me, it looked more like one of those hose attachments, but that’s good too, since the boost came from a sense of washing away the dreck  on the screen. That worked fine too.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/31/garden/frustrating-as-they-are-we-still-cant-live-without-tv-remotes.html?ref=technology

I forgot to add a note: one of the things in the Times piece is a survey of newish remote control devices, including a magic wand with a repertoire of, I think, 13 gestures which you can use to control your TV. I’m serious.  Nobody has figured out why the remotes are all so different….where is the Mute button? Why can’t the major functions be grouped in the same way across all instruments?

The NSF Looks At How It Sifts Grant Proposals In The Big Pitch.

The Big Pitch is a moniker for an experiment being conducted at the National Science Foundation, to see if perhaps the way proposals are currently evaluated might be getting in the way of sponsoring good work. The first intimations, heavily annotated with warnings about their preliminary character, suggest that the answer is yes. In the Pitch, two review panels reviewed a set of proposals on the biological implications of climate change. The first panel got the regular NSF documents, all 15 pages. The second panel got a two page summary, stating what was new or interesting about the proposal, and why  it should be funded. This second set was also anonymous, and all institutional affiliation data had been removed. There was very little overlap in the recommendations. In fact only three submissions were selected as high priority by both groups.  This experiment was repeated on a second group of proposals, this time on aspects of evolution. Again, there was considerable difference in rating. So the NSF is pondering some things. Is the review process passing over good ideas, form lesser known  or even unknown scientists?  Are really good suggestions from smaller schools being neglected in favor of knee-jerk approvals of OK, but not really exciting submissions from established institutions?  There will be more field tests, but the folks at the Foundation are giving all this some serous thought.

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6084/969.full

Krypton.

The stuff that makes Superman lose his powers is krypton. Poor ole SM has to steer clear of it because it makes him just as weak as an ordinary mortal, or worse, since the Superguy seems to suffer from mental fuzziness and confusion as well. In the comic strip, krypton is depicted as a solid; you can pick up a bunch of it and wave it at Superman and he’s  powerless to stop your dastardly deed. But the real krypton is a gas, a member of the small but eminent family of the Noble gases; “noble” because they won’t combine with just any old stuff. They’re very selective.  Well, two British chemists, one a Scot and one and Englishman, discovered krypton today in 1898.

http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2008/05/may-30-1898-krypton-discovered-decades-before-superman-arrives/

My Table Can Beat-up Your Table.

Fighting tables?Yes indeed. In what is either an interesting excursion into robotics and remote control or yet another sign of impending American cultural dissolution, a sub-genre of the Battle of the Giants theme has emerged among US Geeks. The idea is to modify tables, yes, just plain old end tables or night stands or something so that they have some kind of internal vulnerability: legs that fold when hit just right, for instance. They tables also have to be steer-able and  have their mayhem dealing accessories controlled by humans who stand or sit outside the ring in which the combat d’honneur takes place. The people steer their contraptions toward, around and into their opponents and try to trigger that vulnerability which will cause the opponent to fold or fall over.  Is that geeky and nerdy, or what?  Apparently, this year saw the third round of such contests. The participants are not numerous,  but are very dedicated. They also have a not inconsiderable set of skills, which, one thinks, might be directed toward other projects. But, hey.  It’s a free country.  They’re not hurting anybody, and who knows? Maybe something will come of it.

 

http://www.wired.com/playbook/2012/05/table-fighting/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29&pid=596&viewall=true

Paul Fussell, Dead at 88.

Paul Fussell (rhymes with Russell) died at the age of 88 this past weekend. His was hardly a household name, but he was a significant figure in American cultural criticism and literature.  His major work was The Great War and Modern Memory, a review of the ‘literariness’ of World War I. I think it was the pioneer book in the upsurge of interest in all aspects of that conflict, but that’s my opinion. Lots of people think that the war of 1914-18 was special in that it had a certain ‘literary’ quality that lifted it out of the mere blood and mud of all wars.  After all, The Oxford Book of Verse was issued in a special “soldier’s edition”, on thin paper with special printing, which could be tucked easily into a trooper’s knapsack or  tunic pocket. And there were all those War Poets…Sassoon, Owen, Blunden…who wrote so beautifully.  Well, it was and it wasn’t. Verse and poets there may have been, but it was still a frightful, bloody slog. Fussell’s book explored all that quite thoroughly; the high and lower ends, the poets who have entered the “Canon” and the musical hall side, the soldiers’s newspapers, the post-war recollections.  He also wrote a number of specialist, scholarly works in his discipline…18th Century  English Lit…  and he penned several impressive collections of essays. Some of these detailed his own experiences as a soldier in the second of the two great wars. His comments on the limitations of US ‘strategy’ and ‘tactics’ in the European theater were quite acerbic; there was little of either, except direct frontal assault. Tanks of the greatest industrial power on earth were so poorly armored that their crews piled sand bag…dirt, really, to help deflect   projectiles. And they came from direct and personal knowledge, as Fussell was wounded twice. After the war he completed college and went on to develop his gift for teaching, or rather, as he put it, for explaining. He got good degrees from good schools and worked hard. I don’t think he was an easy man to be near, too much the ‘pissed off rifleman’ in his phrase, still wary and caustic.  But he was a good scholar and great writer.

 

http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/the_dilettante/2012/05/paul_fussell_remembering_the_author_of_the_great_war_and_modern_memory.single.html

Your Silent Partner, The FBI?

The G-men are leaning on  IT companies to make it easier for The Bureau, as they style the agency, to listen in on those forms of networking which are hard for them to monitor now. The Feds are forming a new department with an innocuous sounding name, of course, the purpose of which is to ease access into those classes of messages and calls that are at or beyond their current capacities.  So far the response to the solicitations has been cool on the part of the companies, but that may not continue. Balancing liberty and security has always been one of the main tasks of any republic. Some of the surrenders we have made, however, since 2001, have been quite sweeping and there doesn’t seem to be much sentiment about getting that territory back. Nobody wants to seem ‘soft’ on whatever ‘ism’ is supposedly threatening us now. But, a little more reluctance to toss away the constraints on the police powers would be appropriate in a nation that will talk itself purple, yacking to others about the importance of liberty.  There are simply certain things that are nobody’s business: what I read, where I vacation, the kind of music I prefer, my shoe size, my shopping. These things are neither good nor bad. But they belong to me. In the absence of a demonstrated and compelling reason to the contrary, they should stay that way.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/24/fbi-web-surveillance-secret-unit_n_1539835.html?ref=topbar

The Great Bridge Opens In 1883.

The Brooklyn Bridge was the symbol of American engineering mastery. There was simply nothing like it in the world, both at the time and for a long while thereafter. The USA was a big country and people in it learned to think big and then do big. We taught the rest of the world how to do this, so we shouldn’t be surprised that they learned the lessons very well. Brooklyn and New York were two separate cities then (and still are in the minds of many Brooklynites).  Getting to work in New York meant a ferry ride across the East river, then a trolly or subway or cab. Getting home meant the same thing, only in reverse order.  The obvious solution was a bridge, but the technical problems were very great. How all this was mastered, and how the bridge emerged as the pre-eminent masterpiece it was, have all been told with admirable thoroughness and verve in David McCullough’s fine book; The Great Bridge; the epic story of the building of the Brooklyn Bridge. If you haven’t read it, you should, right away. The story is amazing and the people who made it all happen were wonderfully rich characters.  Once the bridge was built, it became indispensable as the way into and out of lower Manhattan. My father told this story, that he had heard from a fellow cop: One day a police officer was directing traffic on the approach to the Manhattan side of the bridge. He kept looking at it, for some reason. And then stopped all traffic onto it. Naturally, there was, shall we say, disagreement about this action’s prudence. But he kept insisting that there was something wrong with the bridge. Finally city engineers showed up and the cop was right. The BB was out of acton for several years for reconstruction. I don’t know if that story is true. I suppose I could look it up, as Casey Stengel said.

http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2010/05/0524brooklyn-bridge-opens/

 

New Books At The Medical Library.

The Medical Library is happy announce that some changes have been made in the way we handle new books.  Every week, a selection of new titles recently added to the collection is placed on display for review by our users. Recently, we’ve begun arranging these differently. They no longer face spine-out on the new book shelf. Instead, they;re displayed cover-out, so you can just glance at an item and read the title without having to turn your head. We have some reasonably comfortable chairs close by, If you decide you want to borrow the item, take it to Circulation with your ID badge. We’ve also added a new feature called Spotlight of the Month. These are not necessarily new. They may have been here a while. They were picked for special display because they describe an important scientific discovery from a new slant, shed light on the personality or work of famous scientists and physicians, or discuss some significant trend or event.  We’re hoping to do this about once a month. Please stop by and see it all.